Although a re-consideration of any archaeological material does not normally require vindication, I will still support my attitude by quoting the English archaeologist Clive Davison: Perhaps the most subtle, yet surely the most significant legacy of the post-processual era has been a growing awareness of the need to critically re-evaluate the basic assumptions of past researches (DAVISON 2000, 231). to widen the scope of the study from various aspects (iconography, prosopograpy), and particularly from the point of view of the recent scholarship on production and trade in marble and stone funerary monuments in Noricum and Pannonia. to correct the falsities and inaccuracies of the previous discussions of the piece in question 2. Therefore, the aims of this paper are the following: 1. This piece was first published in 1909, and has since been mentioned summarily on several occasions.1 Besides some false assumptions put forward in the first publication and perpetuating on and on, the archaeological potential of this stone on the whole has remained underexploited. In this contribution I will reconsider from various points of view the stone ash-chest of Marcus Aurelius Glabrio from Siscia, now in the Archaeological Museum in Zagreb. The aim of this work is, along with the publication of these fragments, to make a comparison with the other epigraphic monuments and to expand our current knowledge about the service of ostiarius in the early Christian church. The sarcophagus shows several interesting features which include the Vulgar Latin text, some special characters, but also the fact that the sarcophagus itself was originally made in 3rd (or perhaps late 2nd) century and remodelled in 5th century. These men were probably buried in a span of a year or two, which is concluded by partially preserved mention of the indictions. the ostiaries (porters) in the Salonitan early Christian church. From the other inscription, which commemorated the person later deceased, we know that his name was Anastasius. The inscription on the central field belonged to an unknown person who was buried the first in the sarcophagus. ![]() The fragments bear two inscriptions from which reads that in the sarcophagus were buried two persons. Similar eunuchs controlled access to lower ranking functionaries.In the depot of the Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments in Split are being kept two fragments of the sarcophagus which were found 85 years ago, during the archaeological excavations in Solin on a site called Å uplja crkva.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |